That's the online simps' fault, 100%.Kugelfisch wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:38 pmonline dating is absolutely brutal.
Women rate almost 80% of men as below average. That fucked up 3/10 hambeast? She thinks anything under a 7 is not just unacceptable, it's insulting.
That's what decades of unchecked ego gets you.
In the early 2000s i created a free troll account on a dating site; all the info the account contained was a fake name, and that i was a woman.
I didn't upload any picture, and i left all the descriptions of my looks blank.
Even though the only info i put on that site was "i'm a woman", in less than an hour i got showered by likes, messages and emails from thirsty idiots who wanted to know me.
It's because of those losers, who were already a thing in the early 2000s, that now the Jamie Marchi out there believe they can pick and choose.
It's probably not just thirst that motivated those guys; they join the site, see that steroid-man's profile received likes, see that no woman contacts them or gives them a like - because they already have simps in the dozens giving them attention - and become desperate for validation.
"Come on hambeast, at least you give me a like or i'm a complete loser!" or something like that.