I liked Fast Five and Furious Seven when they came out. Hobbes and Shaw sucks ass tho, felt like nonsense overload.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 8:40 pmWhat was his last decent movie, The Rundown?
Movie Thread
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6877
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
- Keith Chegwin
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 10349
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Wait, The Rock's made good movies?
Kugelfisch wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 amImagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.
- Rushy
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5609
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
- Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
- Contact:
- Tony Schiavone
- Posts: 2922
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 2:11 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Jumanji was also a lot of fun. But I agree. He needs to stop doing safe Disney shit and start embracing his darker half.
...and still: Spoony did nothing.
- CuckTurdginson
- Posts: 6877
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Surprised no one's vouching for Pain and Gain. Its not a great movie but its a decidedly memorable one and The Rock offers what is likely both his and the movie's best performance.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pmDHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.
Re: Movie Thread
Nobody did. That's why it flopped. I didn't know it was out myself until I saw the poster in the local cinemas. Probably explains why they re-released the Cameron Díaz version on 4k recently.veris leta facies wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 1:19 pmI didn't even know about the new CA movie.Guest wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 1:58 amPaul Feig is throwing a tantrum about his shitty Ghostbusters reboot and Charlie's Angel's flopping.
- Moe Bitches
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 5688
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 4:54 am
- Location: Hell on Earth
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
You mean Skyscraper wasn't edgy enough for ya?Tony Schiavone wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 12:06 amJumanji was also a lot of fun. But I agree. He needs to stop doing safe Disney shit and start embracing his darker half.
da PAC Nigguh wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:06 amShit like this is why satire is dead in currentyear.
- Rapeculture
- Posts: 5990
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
God, Paul Feig is such a huge faggot. Charlie's Angels looked like ass from the trailer alone and the marketing barely existed, you cock holster. That's why it failed.
rabidtictac wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:57 amRapeculture lives in a van by the river and rapes bitches every day.
- Keith Chegwin
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 10349
- Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
Lucas did it with Red Tails. Creators who make a piece of shit film almost always go for the victim card because they want to guilt you into seeing it. They can't argue the film on the merits because it hasn't got any, so they accuse people who didn't see it of being prejudiced instead.Lindsay's Liver wrote: ↑Wed Nov 20, 2019 6:50 pmThe directors who get the most publically snippy, and quick to invoke "progressive" politics, when their film bombs always seem to be peddling in the most shitty, corporate, useless, unasked-for remakes and reboots.
All the marketing in the world wouldn't have saved the film. Like I've said elsewhere, the original Charlie's Angels TV show was just fapbait for guys when they didn't have easy access to porn. The Farrah Fawcett poster at one time adorned the walls of millions of horny teenagers across America. The film reboot, people at least considered Cameron Diaz, Lucy Liu and Drew Barrymore attractive, and they made them dress sexy for the film. They did a TV reboot that had the hot Australian girl from Transformers. The theme of the franchise is titillation. Sexy women spies.Rapeculture wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:35 amGod, Paul Feig is such a huge faggot. Charlie's Angels looked like ass from the trailer alone and the marketing barely existed, you cock holster. That's why it failed.
So what does Banks do? She gets ugly ass Dyke Stew and two mutts to star in her 'female empowerment' reboot and she's surprised that it bombed.
Horny men are a huge fucking marketplace. Even post-internet, a man will slog through the shittest film ever made if there's even the slightest chance that one of the 10/10 actresses will take her top off. Atomic Blonde did very well. But Hollywood doesn't want to cater to this demographic. Instead they seem to want to cast ugly ass dykes and lecture us about how problematic and sexist we are if we don't rush out to see the films. Ghostbusters 2016 wouldn't have been anywhere as much of a disaster if, instead of four fugly women, they cast four fucking stunners instead.
Kugelfisch wrote: ↑Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 amImagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.
- VoiceOfReasonPast
- Supreme Shitposter
- Posts: 54729
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: Movie Thread
But instead they apparently consider it easier to turn every movie release into some kind of ideological war between the forces of Good and Evil.
Certainly a better Conan flick than the actual Conan reboot.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
-Yours Truly
4 wikia: static -> vignette
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests