Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Whine and Bitch about people long after they become interesting to talk about
Post Reply
User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 53834
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:25 pm

You wouldn't believe the weird shit swtards come up to validate their hobby. I mean, there's like this weird "ring theory" of how Star Wars made it big because Georgie exploited ancient storytelling techniques.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
MegaNigger
Blackpill Merchant
Posts: 9232
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 5:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by MegaNigger » Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:32 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:25 pm
You wouldn't believe the weird shit swtards come up to validate their hobby. I mean, there's like this weird "ring theory" of how Star Wars made it big because Georgie exploited ancient storytelling techniques.
I actually read those... they are disgustingly generic points that you cold ascribe to anything if you reach far enough. And they already reached FAR.
-The user formerly known as CIANigger

User avatar
Charlar
DHI's Resident Pussy
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:11 pm

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by Charlar » Wed Jun 07, 2017 8:06 pm

Monomyth?
-On the internet, everyone end up being Spoony or Tim Buckley
-All fanbases are shit
-Most people had, have and will have shit tastes

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 53834
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:00 pm

CIANigger wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:32 pm
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:25 pm
You wouldn't believe the weird shit swtards come up to validate their hobby. I mean, there's like this weird "ring theory" of how Star Wars made it big because Georgie exploited ancient storytelling techniques.
I actually read those... they are disgustingly generic points that you cold ascribe to anything if you reach far enough. And they already reached FAR.
And if there really was this one magical ancient storytelling technique that guarantees Star-Wars-tier success, every movie since forever would've done the exact same thing. It's not like Georgie found these mystical secrets edged into stone tablets he found in a ruin or something.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
pibbs
Posts: 8145
Joined: Tue May 30, 2017 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by pibbs » Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:35 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:00 pm
CIANigger wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:32 pm
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:25 pm
You wouldn't believe the weird shit swtards come up to validate their hobby. I mean, there's like this weird "ring theory" of how Star Wars made it big because Georgie exploited ancient storytelling techniques.
I actually read those... they are disgustingly generic points that you cold ascribe to anything if you reach far enough. And they already reached FAR.
And if there really was this one magical ancient storytelling technique that guarantees Star-Wars-tier success, every movie since forever would've done the exact same thing. It's not like Georgie found these mystical secrets edged into stone tablets he found in a ruin or something.
RLM went into full detail about the BS factor of the "Ring Theory" in their Mr. Plinket Force Awakens review. Good stuff.
Image

cernex
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by cernex » Thu Jun 08, 2017 12:23 am

I thought it was a well established fact all Lucas really did was make a thinly-diguised Flash Gordon ripoff because he never wanted to make Star Wars to begin with: he wanted to make a Flash Gordon film but he couldn't get the rights.

I mean, that's it. All the other stuff in or around it is just stupid. As much as I like Star Stars myself, it's really just a Flash Gordon-type thing done with really big special effects and some -accidental- good acting.
Follow me on Twitter
My Amazon Author page, for if you want to check my fiction and stuff.

User avatar
rabidtictac
Posts: 22262
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by rabidtictac » Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:34 am

I assume he had some kind of stock company because of all the britbongs who worked on the original trilogy? Especially new hope? I don't follow this shit.
RAPEMAN wrote:
Mon Aug 03, 2020 9:42 pm
>liberal: ban x
>trump: yeah ban x
>liberal: no bro x is awesome

User avatar
Le Redditeur
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 12892
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by Le Redditeur » Thu Jun 08, 2017 3:33 am

pibbs wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:35 pm
RLM went into full detail about the BS factor of the "Ring Theory" in their Mr. Plinket Force Awakens review. Good stuff.
Yeah, in fact, Mike "Writer, Producer, Director of Space Cop" Stoklasa spent half the (supposedly) TFA review... reviewing the prequels. Because he can't bring himself to criticize TFA. Because those Disney dollars are still heavy on his pockets.

Vaporwear
Posts: 1397
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 2:48 am
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by Vaporwear » Thu Jun 08, 2017 3:41 am

Le Redditeur wrote:
Thu Jun 08, 2017 3:33 am
pibbs wrote:
Wed Jun 07, 2017 9:35 pm
RLM went into full detail about the BS factor of the "Ring Theory" in their Mr. Plinket Force Awakens review. Good stuff.
Yeah, in fact, Mike "Writer, Producer, Director of Space Cop" Stoklasa spent half the (supposedly) TFA review... reviewing the prequels. Because he can't bring himself to criticize TFA.
Yeah that TFA review was bullshit. The first half was him trashing the prequels again, and the second half was him mostly talking about fan reception to TFA instead of the movie itself. You could condense the actual review to 10 minutes.

Mr. Plinkett is clearly dead. Stoklasa doesn't want to make those type of video essays anymore. Which is fine, cause his other shows are still good, but he's moved away from Mr. Plinkett, and considering what bullshit TFA review was, we're all better off.

User avatar
Liar Revealed
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 7409
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 2:58 pm
Location: WA, USA
Contact:

Re: Brad Jones, The Cinema Snob

Post by Liar Revealed » Thu Jun 08, 2017 3:51 am

I think a good Plinkett review needs to be done many years later so that you can really digest the movie's cultural impact or lack thereof.

Like RLM was way too easy on JJ Trek 1. They kind of fell for the JJ's typical hype of "This movie is just the foundation. Great new stories are coming later, we promise."
Because JJ Trek 2 was derivative shit, and it really illuminates the flaws in part 1.

Same with TFA. It was extremely derivative with a Mary Sue main character with a useless token black sidekick. But we're promised that the deficiencies of the movie are all part of the plan, to be explained later.
ジュウワリオはもう死んでいる。

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Gendo's Ocular Dickhole and 39 guests