Doge Walker and Channel Awesome

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

What shit are you talking about Bram Stoker's Dracula, cuckturgid?

People forget the original novel was highly flawed. I would say the film is better than the original novel in some ways. It's excessive in all the best ways and reminds me a little of JoJo, of all things. The sets and wardrobes are fantastic. You can shit on johnny mnemonic's terrible performance, but sometimes I think his performance was stylistically designed to be that way. Like the main guy from Scanners. When an actor gives an extremely unnatural performance, it's not ALWAYS a product of shitty acting. Like in Scanners, that was very clearly intentional.

The novel was basically an early form of creepypasta, since it is entirely composed of dairy entries and newspaper articles or something. Also comes across as a lot drier than say Frankenstein.
The movie on the other hand is a lot more engaging and has a prity gud atmopshere.

[CuckTurdginson]

I just get bored watching any Dracula movie because I used to hang out with Dracula and masturbate in the corner while I watched Dracula suck the blood from his victims.

[Keith Chegwin]

People forget the original novel was highly flawed. I would say the film is better than the original novel in some ways.

Are you on crack?
Yeah, Bram Stoker's novel isn't exactly War and Peace but it's much better than Francis Ford Coppola's 'muh feminism' re-edit that dared to use his name.

[Guest]

What shit are you talking about Bram Stoker's Dracula, cuckturgid?

People forget the original novel was highly flawed. I would say the film is better than the original novel in some ways. It's excessive in all the best ways and reminds me a little of JoJo, of all things. The sets and wardrobes are fantastic. You can shit on johnny mnemonic's terrible performance, but sometimes I think his performance was stylistically designed to be that way. Like the main guy from Scanners. When an actor gives an extremely unnatural performance, it's not ALWAYS a product of shitty acting. Like in Scanners, that was very clearly intentional.

The novel was basically an early form of creepypasta, since it is entirely composed of dairy entries and newspaper articles or something. Also comes across as a lot drier than say Frankenstein.
The movie on the other hand is a lot more engaging and has a prity gud atmopshere.

Only the middle part is composed in an epistolary manner. It begins with Jonathan Harker in normal novel form travelling to Dracula's castle and up until he is ostensibly trapped. When that act concludes it uses letters and diaries to continue the narrative (and very effectively might I add, as having to start so many threads would have been tiresome in the usual way) and that format ends when Lucy begins her transformation into a Bride of Dracula, then it shifts back into prose.

[rabidtictac]

People forget the original novel was highly flawed. I would say the film is better than the original novel in some ways.

Are you on crack?
Yeah, Bram Stoker's novel isn't exactly War and Peace but it's much better than Francis Ford Coppola's 'muh feminism' re-edit that dared to use his name.

I must have missed all the feminist stuff.

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

Only the middle part is composed in an epistolary manner. It begins with Jonathan Harker in normal novel form travelling to Dracula's castle and up until he is ostensibly trapped. When that act concludes it uses letters and diaries to continue the narrative (and very effectively might I add, as having to start so many threads would have been tiresome in the usual way) and that format ends when Lucy begins her transformation into a Bride of Dracula, then it shifts back into prose.

Maybe I need to read it again, but it kinda lost me during that middle part, when it stopped being about a spooky castle full of vampire hoes.

[Keith Chegwin]

I must have missed all the feminist stuff.

It's actually pretty hard to miss.

Only the middle part is composed in an epistolary manner.

I have the novel right here and I can plainly see that you're wrong and Voice is right. It begins with Jonathan Harker's Journal

[Just Some Random Guy]

Dracula (the book) does drag a bit in some parts of the middle section but I still think it's pretty good on the whole.

[MegaNigger]

Dracula (the book) does drag a bit in some parts of the middle section but I still think it's pretty good on the whole.

I need to go back and read that again now that I'm older. I had a copy when I was 14, read it, and didn't understand anything that was going on.

[Guest]

I never read Dracula but I did read Frankenstein. Need to read it again, it's been a while. IIRC that nigger was up and around talking and shucking and jiving. No bolts or funny shaped head. All he wanted was gf. Really made me think.