They'd still be like 80% liable. IANAL but, if you look at the McDonald's coffee case, the jury found that McDonald's was mostly liable for that incident, and therefore had to pay, because, even though it was the woman's fault that she spilled coffee in her lap, at the temperature McDonald's serves coffee it was going to cause 3rd degree burns on contact, the cup was insufficiently marked to warn people of this and I think the top may have been faulty as wellLiar Revealed wrote: ↑Tue Nov 01, 2022 4:05 amI read somewhere that her tailbone/lower back was already damaged before this incident due to years of extreme porn. If so, she was extremely stupid to do what she did there. Twitch lawyers could seize on that. I think they're probably still going to have to shell out in a settlement.
Basically, even if the woman already damaged her back from years of being a 'ho, Twitch are still mostly liable because they ran that foam pit without either checking to make sure that it was safe to jump in, or putting up a sign to warn people not to jump in it. Plus they kept it open even after this woman injured her back so they're grossly negligent at best.
