Movie Thread

Music, Movies, just about anything that isn't gaming related but is still entertainment goes here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Rapeculture
Posts: 5929
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rapeculture » Mon Nov 04, 2019 11:15 pm

Guest wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:53 pm
Rapeculture wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:04 pm
Rushy wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:57 pm
Just finished the 1941 Wolf Man. It felt to me like what the Mummy was in 1999 - a kind of flamboyant, schlocky horror romp. I was a bit split on Chaney Jr - he doesn't really look or act like a leading man, but those droopy sad eyes do work in his favor, at least.
I might enjoy it then. I like the 1999 version of The Mummy. For all its schlockyness, it was good time in the theater.
Jewess Rachel Weisz in her prime was a legend. Van Helsing was better though.
Agreed on both counts.
rabidtictac wrote:
Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:57 am
Rapeculture lives in a van by the river and rapes bitches every day.

User avatar
CuckTurdginson
Posts: 6654
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by CuckTurdginson » Tue Nov 05, 2019 2:38 am

I liked Parasite quite a bit. Of Bong Joon-ho's movies, I've only seen Snowpiercer but I found Parasite to just be enrapturing every step of the way.
rabidtictac wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pm
DHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.

User avatar
Guest

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Guest » Tue Nov 05, 2019 2:45 am

Rushy wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:57 pm
Just finished the 1941 Wolf Man. It felt to me like what the Mummy was in 1999 - a kind of flamboyant, schlocky horror romp. I was a bit split on Chaney Jr - he doesn't really look or act like a leading man, but those droopy sad eyes do work in his favor, at least.
Cheney Junior as the Wolfman worked for me. For one thing that's one of those movies that works primarily because of the actors involved. The cinematography on that movie as kind of blase, certain shots remind me of TV blocking. Lon Chaney Jr has the slightly pudgy, aging every man with a happy-go-lucky personality in a can do attitude is likable enough. When he's bitten by a werewolf in his life is ruined you feel bad, because you like him and when you start to fall apart because he realizes he's turning into a monster that kills people he really sells it. Compare him to Benicio del Toro in the remake directed by Joe I Don't Give A fuck Johnson who's written as a miserable person at the beginning of the film who becomes an even more miserable person who turns into a werewolf. That and the fact that the movie didn't know if I wanted to be an action movie or Friday the 13th style slasher.

User avatar
Guest

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Guest » Tue Nov 05, 2019 4:47 am

18 years later and Midway's effects look worse than Pearl Harbor's.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54053
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:03 pm

Guest wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:53 pm
Jewess Rachel Weisz in her prime was a legend. Van Helsing was better though.
Mummy '99 was a delightfully pulpy romp I could watch all day. Van Helsing on the other hand isn't quite my jam. I think the movie got a bit too silly for me, what with the steam-powered assault crossbow and Dracula's real castle residing in some fuckhuge cavern that could probably take all of New York City. A bit less would've been more imo.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Rushy
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5578
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rushy » Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:39 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:03 pm
Guest wrote:
Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:53 pm
Jewess Rachel Weisz in her prime was a legend. Van Helsing was better though.
Mummy '99 was a delightfully pulpy romp I could watch all day. Van Helsing on the other hand isn't quite my jam. I think the movie got a bit too silly for me, what with the steam-powered assault crossbow and Dracula's real castle residing in some fuckhuge cavern that could probably take all of New York City. A bit less would've been more imo.
I never saw Van Helsing, but having heard of the plot, I don't get why they stuffed all the monsters in one movie. Surely it would've been more profitable to just do schlocky remakes of all of their movies? I'd dig an action-focused 90s Dark Universe.
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:36 pm
Oh there will be fucker for sure.

User avatar
CuckTurdginson
Posts: 6654
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:19 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by CuckTurdginson » Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:43 pm

https://birthmoviesdeath.com/2019/11/05 ... rCyo4Nlxow

Stephen King claims that the upcoming Doctor Sleep 'partially redeems' Kubrick's "The Shining." A ringing anti-endorsement if I've ever heard one.
rabidtictac wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2025 11:02 pm
DHI is proof you can be both a massive homosexual and a virgin. They're not exclusive. If you display both in large enough quantities you can qualify for mod status.

User avatar
Rushy
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5578
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rushy » Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:55 pm

CuckTurdginson wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:43 pm
https://birthmoviesdeath.com/2019/11/05 ... rCyo4Nlxow

Stephen King claims that the upcoming Doctor Sleep 'partially redeems' Kubrick's "The Shining." A ringing anti-endorsement if I've ever heard one.
he's saying it because it retcons the plot points from the Shining that contradicted his book
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:36 pm
Oh there will be fucker for sure.

User avatar
Rapeculture
Posts: 5929
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 8:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rapeculture » Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:59 pm

Rushy wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:55 pm
CuckTurdginson wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:43 pm
https://birthmoviesdeath.com/2019/11/05 ... rCyo4Nlxow

Stephen King claims that the upcoming Doctor Sleep 'partially redeems' Kubrick's "The Shining." A ringing anti-endorsement if I've ever heard one.
he's saying it because it retcons the plot points from the Shining that contradicted his book
Apparently not all of them. Because doesn't the Overlook Hotel burn to the ground in the book? It's still standing in the Doctor Sleep movie.
rabidtictac wrote:
Wed Aug 09, 2023 4:57 am
Rapeculture lives in a van by the river and rapes bitches every day.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54053
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:06 pm

If I remember correctly, it actually blew the fuck up because the boiler went apeshit. That was in fact one of the reasons they needed a janitor during off-season: to keep dat shit in line.

Also
>supposedly redeeming a movie that needs no redeeming in the eyes of literally everyone but you

This movie will tank.
Rushy wrote:
Tue Nov 05, 2019 6:39 pm
I never saw Van Helsing, but having heard of the plot, I don't get why they stuffed all the monsters in one movie. Surely it would've been more profitable to just do schlocky remakes of all of their movies? I'd dig an action-focused 90s Dark Universe.
Maybe they wanted to borrow a bit from that League of the Extraordinary Gentlemen movie. Or they followed the logic of a lot of video games set in a specific time period or mythology: Cram as many famous characters and monsters from that period/mythology in there.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 22 guests