Marzgunt: Queen of Hashtags (and fabricated outrage)

[Osterzone]

Watching Nick's stream, all I keep thinking about is that scene at the end of Glengarry Glen Ross when Jack Lemmon's character starts running his mouth and ends up saying too much. Nick brings up tweets from Rooster Teeth people running their mouths that show that it can be argued they conspired to oust Vic. One of them flat out said he's guilty of what the i09 article says.

[Kama]

I have a hard time watching this Nick guy. "Yo man I'm a true and real lawyer, but all I do is stream on youtube and talk about what a true and real lawyer would do in this court case." He comes off more like a LARPer more than an actual lawyer. If he is a real lawyer then I wonder why he isn't getting his own clients to defend, and also why would you spell out the strategy Vic's legal team would use in his suit? Wouldn't that mean they could counter that strategy?

[Osterzone]

Because he's in buttfuck Spicer Minnesota, population 1200. Not a lot happens there. There's nothing wrong with saying "if I was Vic's lawyer, I'd do this." Also since he's not Vic's legal counsel, he can say whatever. Why would Vic's opponents listen to a guy that doesn't know what Vic will do? With the way the Funimation/Rooster Teeth affiliated people are acting, they haven't even spoken to any lawyers yet, even after knowing Vic's retained his lawyers weeks ago.

[Kama]

All I'm saying is maybe he shouldn't be waving around a playbook of all the legal strategies Vic could use with a big neon sign pointing to it. Best thing to do would be to say nothing and let Vic's defense handle things. I just wouldn't want to see his defense get sabotaged cause some youtuber is running his mouth. I know that's a big stretch, but shit like that could happen unintentionally. Especially if Nick is running around saying "this is all the evidence Vic can use." Okay well I hope that his opposition doesn't try to get all that evidence declared inadmissible.

I'm probably arguing playing it too safe anyways

[Osterzone]

That's not how law works, and Vic isn't on the defensive, he's the one who will be suing. He believes he's being defamed and his lawyers have the right to discovery.

[rabidtictac]

Doesn't matter what Nick says tbh. He's not Vic's lawyer and it doesn't matter what he tells marzcunt because IF THEY DELETE EVIDENCE, THAT WILL ONLY FUCK THEM HARDER.

It's not like they can go baleet everything and pretend it never happened. Everything will come out in court if it goes that far. Anything these idiots try to cover up will only get them prison time.

[Kama]

Alright then. My bad. I just didn't like it cause the last thing you need is someone exposing your entire hand before you're even in the court room. But if that's not how it works, and we don't have to worry about Nick compromising any of the evidence Vic can use in the case by talking openly about it then I guess I had nothing to worry about.

[Poonoo]

All I'm saying is maybe he shouldn't be waving around a playbook of all the legal strategies Vic could use with a big neon sign pointing to it. Best thing to do would be to say nothing and let Vic's defense handle things. I just wouldn't want to see his defense get sabotaged cause some youtuber is running his mouth. I know that's a big stretch, but shit like that could happen unintentionally. Especially if Nick is running around saying "this is all the evidence Vic can use." Okay well I hope that his opposition doesn't try to get all that evidence declared inadmissible.

I'm probably arguing playing it too safe anyways

If they hire lawyers to defend themselves the lawyer will know what they can and can't do, this isn't like some complex military strategies since the law is more clear cut. It's not like a lawyer will look at rekeita's stream and think "wow, this guy is good, I wish I knew what I was doing like him".

[Kama]

All I'm saying is maybe he shouldn't be waving around a playbook of all the legal strategies Vic could use with a big neon sign pointing to it. Best thing to do would be to say nothing and let Vic's defense handle things. I just wouldn't want to see his defense get sabotaged cause some youtuber is running his mouth. I know that's a big stretch, but shit like that could happen unintentionally. Especially if Nick is running around saying "this is all the evidence Vic can use." Okay well I hope that his opposition doesn't try to get all that evidence declared inadmissible.

I'm probably arguing playing it too safe anyways

If they hire lawyers to defend themselves the lawyer will know what they can and can't do, this isn't like some complex military strategies since the law is more clear cut. It's not like a lawyer will look at rekeita's stream and think "wow, this guy is good, I wish I knew what I was doing like him".

I was thinking more like


"Wow, now we have a detailed list of stuff we can get thrown out so Vic can't use it."

But yeah I guess that's not something to worry about.

[Guest]

All I'm saying is maybe he shouldn't be waving around a playbook of all the legal strategies Vic could use with a big neon sign pointing to it. Best thing to do would be to say nothing and let Vic's defense handle things. I just wouldn't want to see his defense get sabotaged cause some youtuber is running his mouth. I know that's a big stretch, but shit like that could happen unintentionally. Especially if Nick is running around saying "this is all the evidence Vic can use." Okay well I hope that his opposition doesn't try to get all that evidence declared inadmissible.

I'm probably arguing playing it too safe anyways

If they hire lawyers to defend themselves the lawyer will know what they can and can't do, this isn't like some complex military strategies since the law is more clear cut. It's not like a lawyer will look at rekeita's stream and think "wow, this guy is good, I wish I knew what I was doing like him".

I was thinking more like


"Wow, now we have a detailed list of stuff we can get thrown out so Vic can't use it."

But yeah I guess that's not something to worry about.

They have to have a legal REASON to throw it out. They can't just be like "Hey judge, this youtube lawyer said the prosecution might use these tweets between Marzgurl and these ANN employees. Well we know about so we're calling jinx! Now they can't use those tweets as evidence anymore!"

You're confusing this with shit like an illegal search and seizure, where someone broke the law to get evidence. Everything the #KickVic cunts posted online is public access and completely admissible.