Boogie1488: The Fats of our Lives

[Kugelfisch]

Most if not all of them have been on anti-depressants at least. I don't think it's too far of a stretch to claim that they are either causing or at least not preventing their misbehaviours. We should just execute the mentally ill instead. Way less deaths, much lower costs.

[Guest]

Lupaposter, Are you one of those who thinks all medication that alters/can alter behavior is bad, or do you mean that psyche medications specifically are causing more mental illness/psychotic behaviors? I've heard about folks being on antipsychotics but I have no idea what those are like, what the side effects are or how many schooters (as you say) have been on them.

Not that Lubaposter but I'd agree with him. I was on brain pills and they drove me batty, ruined my already shitty life.
Dr. Sheckleberg should do us all a favor and just fry Boog's brain outright, I'm tired of this fat faggot and even talking shit about him has become a bore.

[Kugelfisch]

Perfect proof. A man off his goy meds and he speaks perfect clear sense.

[oldbones]

I just watched this pile of shit empathizing with young and rich youtubers complaining about how hard they have it. If you want your blood to boil just watch this tub of lard try to convince you that these youtube fags deserve anything besides pure hatred.

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

They're working hard, guize.

Also I'm not sure if it really is new meds, or if his skin has just naturally become thinner, as is the usual evolution for internet nobodies.

[Guest]

Even this fat fuck couldn't be that tone deaf. I'm convinced videos like this are designed to piss his audience off and trigger a chorus of "I love you boogie but wtf"s type responses in the comments. Those comments all count as "engagement," which is the secret sauce for youtube algorithm exposure.

[mad bum]

Even this fat fuck couldn't be that tone deaf. I'm convinced videos like this are designed to piss his audience off and trigger a chorus of "I love you boogie but wtf"s type responses in the comments. Those comments all count as "engagement," which is the secret sauce for youtube algorithm exposure.

That's why so many videos are nothing more than questions anymore. Like "The worse wii game ever!?" or "Can DHI really be this smart?" I swear putting a question mark in your video title is basically the recipe for success.

[Kugelfisch]

That's why so many videos are nothing more than questions anymore. Like "The worse wii game ever!?" or "Can DHI really be this smart?" I swear putting a question mark in your video title is basically the recipe for success.

A very old old media trick you still see in newspapers. If the title of the article is a question, the answer is "No.". Why would you tease if you had actual news? Back in the forties you didn't read "Did Germany capitulate?", you read "Germany capitulates!".

[rabidtictac]

The answer to "is this article interesting" is always "no" if the article is phrased as a question. When you have something interesting to say, you phrase it as a declaration.

"Germany declares war on Great Britain!" vs "Did Germany declare war on Great Britain?"

Not only will the answer always be no to such shitty question-baiting, but the article will be boring as fuck, to boot. Most news is boring and shit because there's only x amount of interesting news in the world.

[VoiceOfReasonPast]

Tabloid press loves that shit. Starts the article with this big question, and then they just meander around stuff everyone already knows, only to then not give any actual answer.