Movie Thread

Music, Movies, just about anything that isn't gaming related but is still entertainment goes here.
Post Reply
User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54029
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:40 pm

It's like they could've prevented these types of issues if they'd just rebooted the whole thing.
Sure, it probably wouldn't have been as good as the original, but it's not like some sequel made decades after the sequel will be any better.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Keith Chegwin » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:44 pm

Rushy wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:30 pm
That's why I said I don't know how much creative control King had
He allowed them to make it a sequel to Kubrick's film, that's his creative control
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:40 pm
It's like they could've prevented these types of issues if they'd just rebooted the whole thing.
Why?
The whole impetus for making it a sequel to Kubrick's film is that Kubrick's film is iconic and very popular, and nobody wants to see a fucking sequel to King's TV miniseries. A reboot would have accomplished exactly nothing
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 am
Imagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54029
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:46 pm

Just like the sequel will.
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Keith Chegwin » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:52 pm

True, but at least this way they'll only be sinking money into a sequel nobody wants/cares about rather than sinking money into a reboot AND a sequel that nobody wants/cares about
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 am
Imagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.

User avatar
Rushy
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5578
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rushy » Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:56 pm

VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:46 pm
Just like the sequel will.
I concur
it's just weird to focus so much on Kubrick's film, yet not bring anyone back who actually appeared in that movie or had anything to do with it.
I mean, alright, no Nicholson, but couldn't they go to the old folks' home and get that old-ass bartender to do the creepy stare in front of a greenscreen for a few seconds?
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:36 pm
Oh there will be fucker for sure.

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Keith Chegwin » Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:06 pm

Joe Turkel is like a million years old and hasn't appeared in a film since 1990. You had a better chance of getting Nicholson
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 am
Imagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.

User avatar
TheManWithNoPlan
Posts: 1596
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 1:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by TheManWithNoPlan » Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:24 pm

I’m shocked there is no CGI young Jack Nicholson appearance.

User avatar
Rushy
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 5578
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:52 am
Location: Don't ask if you don't want to know
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Rushy » Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:59 pm

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:06 pm
Joe Turkel is like a million years old and hasn't appeared in a film since 1990. You had a better chance of getting Nicholson
I dunno, he still seems fond of the role
Image
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 1:36 pm
Oh there will be fucker for sure.

User avatar
VoiceOfReasonPast
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 54029
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by VoiceOfReasonPast » Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:26 pm

Keith Chegwin wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:52 pm
True, but at least this way they'll only be sinking money into a sequel nobody wants/cares about rather than sinking money into a reboot AND a sequel that nobody wants/cares about
You could like, not to the sequel if the reboot bombs.

(I'd say a reboot had a smaller chance of bombing because it would actually be called The Motherfucking Shining.)
Autism attracts more autism. Sooner or later, an internet nobody will attract the exact kind of fans - and detractors - he deserves.
-Yours Truly

4 wikia: static -> vignette

User avatar
Keith Chegwin
Supreme Shitposter
Posts: 10349
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:42 am
Contact:

Re: Movie Thread

Post by Keith Chegwin » Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:39 pm

Rushy wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:59 pm
I dunno, he still seems fond of the role
He might be fond of the role but that doesn't mean he's up to the demands of filming a big budget motion picture in his 90s
VoiceOfReasonPast wrote:
Thu Oct 31, 2019 8:26 pm
You could like, not to the sequel if the reboot bombs.

It would still count in their projections.
Kugelfisch wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 2:05 am
Imagine spending a billion US dollars to be a loser. Could've watched animu and be one for free.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests