RAPEMAN wrote: ↑Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:29 pm
I remember Nick Bates from his inception on /cwc/. We always assumed he was trying to garner attention by divulging his shit fetishes, his poor hygiene and how he ate his sisters ass (or licked her cheeks because she didn't wipe well).
Oh, right, that was it. So his excuse was that he said he only didn't lick her asshole because there was shit on it. By proving that shit actually turns him on and that that wouldn't have stopped him he wanted to prove that the entire story was made up.
So what it boils down to is:
"Your honour, my claim of having licked her butt was fabricated by me. The proof is that if I actually had been in the situation of being faced with her asshole, feces wouldn't have stopped me from raping that child. In fact, it would've been a turn-on. I present to you the evidence of me jacking off with my own shit in my hand as a proof for it."
Let's be honest, the jury didn't care. They didn't care if the guy actually licked her butt or not. They've no doubt been shown his videos and had to listen to his songs about raping kids anally. They saw that deranged guy that was clearly fucked in the head and well on his way to do disturbing shit to a child eventually even if it didn't happen. They decided to lock him up because, for a lack of an ability to kill him via legal means, it was the best course of action and everyone agrees.